Gollancz is delighted to welcome guest blogger, Tom Abba to the blog. Tom Abba is a specialist in narrative theory and practice, working within interactive media, and across film and television. Today, Tom shares some insight into The King in Yellow, HBO’s True Detective, digital books and beyond. You can find out more about Tom on his website.
Okay, so here’s the thing. The King in Yellow is either the thematic backbone of HBO’s True Detective,or it’s an incidental device being utilised by the hipster crowd to draw in the weird fiction mob and convince them that this series is worth sticking with. Time will tell which of these is true, but in the words of a noted writer of my acquaintance (hi Nick), rest assured, there is a Dog. It might not be the dog you expected, but it is there and it is barking.
Either way, the end result is that a short story collection from 1895 sat at #9 Amazon’s bestseller lists. Then, something interesting happened (interesting to me, anyway. I’m interested in the future of publishing, the ways in which we can extend the book beyond the physical object, and the practical aspects of those academic-sounding ideas. And I’m an academic who uses ‘and’ at the start of a sentence), Gollancz released another eBook edition of Chambers text, this time with Ambrose Bierce’s short story ‘An Inhabitant of Carcosa‘ and a copy of the entry on Robert Chambers from the online Encyclopedia of Science Fiction. Curated content, selected for and undoubtedly a timely nudge to a fanbase, all for the simple, micropayment point of 99p.
First of all, before we begin, a note from history.
Way back at the end of the 1990s, Scott McCloud wrote his follow up to Understanding Comics; Reinventing Comics. In Understanding Comics, McCloud had explored and defined a critical language for comics, and now he turned his attention to the potential of digital platforms on the fields language and distribution.
To say that Reinventing Comics wasn’t as big a hit as Understanding Comics is a little bit of an understatement. McCloud advocates a number of things that are so fixed in their time, and whether or not they’re a better present than the one we have (massive clue – unless you’re a huge fan of motion comics as the pinnacle of digital form, then McCloud’s ideas are so much better than the present), the industry as a whole hasn’t really adopted them (although see this beautiful piece of comics-that-can-only-work-in-digital-space). He also proposes micropayment as a solution to falling revenues and a downwardly spiralling indie comics scene.
In 1999, we didn’t have a micropayment infrastructure. It would take several years before a combination of iTunes, a generation comfortable with having their credit card details held by a faceless organisation online, and a period of relative prosperity in the west turned a micropayment pipe dream into a practical framework.
McCloud was ahead of his time.
And then there’s this.
And this, specifically:
When we think about digital’s effect on storytelling, we tend to grasp for the lowest hanging imaginative fruits. The common cliche is that digital will ‘bring stories to life.’ Words will move. Pictures become movies. Narratives will be choose-your-own-adventure. While digital does make all of this possible, these are the changes of least radical importance brought about by digitization of text. These are the answers to the question, “How do we change books to make them digital?” The essence of digital’s effect on publishing requires a subtle shift towards the query: “How does digital change books?”
Craig Mod’s essay, first published in 2011 has been feted, quoted and exalted by a number of industry insiders and critical thinkers and has had absolutely no effect on their business practices whatsoever. In this, and a small collection of other pieces published around the same time (names), he outlines a seat of coherent and contingent issues at the heart of the emergence of digital products and platforms in publishing.
How does digital change books?
If you want an example of the answers to the question, “How do we change books to make them digital?” then look at this piece in the Guardian review. That’s right, all of Wikipedia printed as a bound volume. Instantly out of date, shockingly irrelevant and symptomatic of the desire of conventional presses to make books digital. If you’ve supported this project, your only defence is that you either have money to burn, or that you took leave of your senses sometime in 1996.
And, as an aside, James Bridle’s print of the Iraq War entry makes the exact opposite point to that demonstrated by printing the whole site.
Anyway, back to Craig Mod and The King in Yellow.
How does digital change books? One of the problems with Mod’s insights, and maybe the reason that he’s quoted a lot, but has had comparatively little effect, is that figuring out how digital changes books is really quite difficult. It’s simple of me to say (as I do quite a lot) that adding video and animation to an eBook does not address the question. It’s easy for Baldur Bjarnason to say that “But there’s another more subtle problem with this type of interactivity. They add little to no value to a text exactly because they are harmonious and integrate well with most texts. Because they don’t disrupt or restructure anything, they are sapped of power.” (It isn’t easy to say that, by the way. It takes time and energy and thought). It is, thought far more difficult to make the sort of work that proposes a solution, however faltering, to Mod ‘s thesis.
And, to my surprise, Gollancz’ edition of The King in Yellow is actually a step toward that solution. What it does is this. Alongside the additional Pierce short story is Chambers’ entry from the SFE. This edition of the SFE hasn’t been printed, hasn’t (as far as I know, at least) been included in any form as a bound volume; print or digital) and only exists to be read by the public in its online state. Hyperlinked, networked, nodes and spines and flares of content.
An extended text.
What’s interesting about digital books is that the form; the fundamental shape and mechanic can be so much more than we’ve seen so far. To date, choose-your-own-adventure has actually been the technical highpoint for a lot of the industry; the addition of some video content that makes the book ‘enhanced’. Mod’s reaching for something ambitious, and that’s going to be difficult. The SFE, in it’s current digital incarnation, is an example of a smart transition to digital from print. It’s not the physical encyclopedia repurposed for a digital platform. Under the hood there’s a complete rethinking around what the point of the SFE is, and how it can be used. The image repository, outgoing links, citation advice, topic-specific searches; these scratch the surface of what a digital encyclopedia can be, but they are a significant step in the right direction. How fiction responds to that challenge certainly remains to be seen, but it can be a great deal more interesting than we’ve seen (if you’re interested in this space, then The Silent History, Device 6, Fish and These Pages Fall Like Ash are worth a look (disclaimer – the last of those is jointly my work)).
links to each above:
Silent History: http://www.thesilenthistory.com/
Device 6: http://simogo.com/games/device6/
These Pages Fall Like Ash: http://wearecircumstance.com/these-pages-fall-like-ash.html
Consider this:The obvious changes wrought by digital on the process that produced that edition of The King in Yellow are programmatic. They are, as George Walkley has described, the speed of response to gather the content, decide to publish, bind under an existing imprint and get into digital stores the day before True Detective aired in the UK. The real shift though, is the existence of the ‘book as a node’. Chambers’ SFE entry links to all of the thematic, ancillary and connected content on the main SFE site. It’s likely that few readers of the Gollancz edition will explore the SFE in any real depth, but some will. It’s likely that if they’ve bought that edition of The King in Yellow, then they’ve been reading the analysis of the series on i09, on the Wall St Journal, on Reddit and on a long list of other sources. They’ve been participating in a networked discussion, facilitated by a combination of BitTorrent, quality online journalism, intelligent discussion and comments, and inquiring minds. They’ve read this content exactly as Vannevar Bush described Memex – information by association, the mind leaping from one thing to the next instantaneously. And now this edition of the book that Nic Pizzolatto has been dangling in front of us since the start plays the same interconnected, networked games as we’ve been doing ourselves.
The King in Yellow is a smart, timely intervention by a publisher with the means and opportunity to grab a slice of the True Detective pie before it spoils. But it’s also one of the first coherent answers to Craig Mod’s questions that we’ve seen so far.